Q 1. The transit workers strike was actually illegal. After a similar walkout years before, the Taylor Law had been enacted; it barred transportation workers from leaving their posts and implemented arbitration methods for settling disputes. When the workers ignored the law, a judge hit them with fines and sentenced their leaders to short jail terms. In the face of the strike’s illegality, how can a rights argument be mounted to ethically justify the walkout? Is the rights argument affected by the fact that many commuters suffered? 2. What is the public safety argument against a union going out on strike? From the information provided, how could it be implemented in this case? How would the public safety argument against the strike differ from the public welfare argument? In general terms, is there a public welfare argument that could be sketched in favor of the strike? Cite your sources.?